Whistleblower Lawyer Blog

The Justice Department has just announced that, to protect patients from harm in seven Georgia psychiatric hospitals, its Civil Rights Division has filed for relief including immediate appointment of a monitor to protect those patients.

DOJ cited the threat to patients of "imminent and serious threat of harm to their lives, health and safety."

The seven hospitals include East Central Regional Hospital, Georgia Regional Hospital at Savannah, Georgia Regional Hospital at Atlanta, Southwestern State Hospital, Central State Hospital, West Central Georgia Regional Hospital, and Northwest Georgia Regional Hospital.

The announcement is repinted below:

Continue reading "Georgia Psychiatric Hospitals: Justice Department Suit for Immediate Relief to Protect Patients" »

Attorneys from across the country will gather tomorrow in Atlanta to discuss health care fraud and the 2009 amendments to the False Claims Act, the nation's primary whistleblower statute.

I am pleased to be on the panel discussing "False Claims Act Developments," moderated by Jack Boese of Fried Frank. This will be a particularly interesting year for this annual meeting, as Congress enacted major changes to the False Claims Act that took effect on May 20, 2009.

In addition, the "Health Care Fraud Enforcement Act" pending in the Senate would enhance further the government's tools used to investigate and remedy Medicare and Medicaid fraud. This bill would remove any question that all payments made pursuant to illegal kickbacks are "false" for purposes of the False Claims Act.

Among the significant 2009 changes to the False Claims Act made by the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act are the following:

1. The amendments expanded the definition of "claim," and fraud directed against government contractors, grantees, and other recipients is now plainly covered by the False Claims Act.

2. Funds administered by the United States government (e.g., in Iraq) are now protected.

3. Retaining overpayments of money from the government is now a stated basis of liability, which is a source of concern for health care providers, among others.

4. Liability for "conspiracy" to violate the Act is now broader.

5. Protection of whistleblowers and others against "retaliation" now extends not only to "employees," but also to "contractors" and "agents"; and persons other than "employers" potentially may be liable for retaliation.

6. In investigations, the government now has authority to use "Civil Investigative Demands" more broadly, and to share information more with state and local authorities and with whistleblowers/relators.

7. A standard definition of what is "material" now applies in False Claims Act cases.

8. The statute of limitations has been clarified for when the government asserts its own claims, after the whistleblower (or "relator") has filed a qui tam case under the False Claims Act.

The full agenda for tomorrow's "SOUTHEASTERN HEALTH CARE FRAUD INSTITUTE" is below:

Continue reading "Health Care Fraud Lawyers Gather to Discuss Amendments to False Claims Act and Other Whistleblower Developments" »

The battle against those who steal taxpayer dollars through Medicare fraud and other health care fraud took a step forward this week. The Senate is now considering the "Health Care Fraud Enforcement Act," which will enhance the government's tools used to investigate and remedy Medicare and Medicaid fraud.

After a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday on “Effective Strategies for Preventing Health Care Fraud,” Senators Leahy, Kaufman, Specter, Kohl, Schumer, and Klobuchar sponsored the new anti-fraud measure.

Excerpts of the Senate announcement follow:

The bill makes straightforward but critical improvements to the federal sentencing guidelines, to health care fraud statutes, and to forfeiture, money laundering, and obstruction statutes, all of which would strengthen prosecutors’ ability to combat this particularly destructive form of fraud. These improvements include:

o Increasing funding: Money spent on health care fraud prevention and enforcement is returned manifold through costs savings and civil and criminal recoveries. This bill authorizes a modest, yet significant, increase in federal antifraud spending of $20,000,000 per year through 2016.

The new bill would add to legislation earlier this year to strengthen law enforcement statutes aimed at fraud, the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act.

Of particular importance to qui tam whistleblower cases under the False Claims Act, the nation's major whistleblower law, the new bill removes any ambiguity that "kickbacks" violate the False Claims Act. The official summary discusses kickbacks in section 2(c):

Section 2(c). Kickbacks

All too often, health care providers secure business by paying illegal kickbacks, which needlessly increase health care risks and costs. When a doctor’s independent judgment is compromised by a kickback, the patient faces the risk that the doctor is making decisions that are not in the patient’s best interest. In addition, excessive payments to doctors increase health care costs, may result in unfair competition, and may compromise medical research independence and the standards of scientific integrity.

The Department of Justice has had success both prosecuting illegal kickbacks and pursuing False Claims Act (FCA) matters predicated on underlying violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS). Nevertheless, defendants in such FCA cases continue to mount legal challenges. A court recently held that, even though a device company may have paid a kickback to a doctor to use a particular medical device, the bill for the procedure to implant the device was not false because the claim was submitted by the innocent hospital, and not by the doctor. United States ex rel. Thomas v. Bailey, 2008 WL 4853630 (E.D. Ark.) (Nov. 6, 2008). In other words, a claim that results from a kickback and that is false when submitted by a wrongdoer is laundered into a "clean" claim when an innocent third party finally submits the claim to the government for payment. This has the effect of insulating both the payor and the recipient of the kickback from FCA liability. This obstacle to a successful FCA action particularly limits Department’s ability to recover from pharmaceutical and device manufacturers, because in such instances the claims arising from the illegal kickbacks typically are not submitted by the physicians that received the kickbacks, but by pharmacies and hospitals that had no knowledge of the underlying unlawful conduct.

This section remedies the problem by amending the AKS to ensure that all claims resulting from illegal kickbacks are false, even when the claims are not submitted directly by the wrongdoers themselves. (Notably, in such circumstances, neither AKS nor FCA liability will lie against an innocent third party that submitted the claim but lacked the requisite intent required under those statutes.)

The full text of the bill is below:

Continue reading "New ‘‘Health Care Fraud Enforcement Act of 2009’’ Includes Health Care Whistleblower Provisions Aimed at Kickbacks" »

With the nation's health care costs growing, a DOJ and HHS initiative to combat health care fraud continues to show progress.

Building on past enforcement efforts, in May 2009 the government announced its Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT), as part of what is now a Cabinet-level battle against Medicare fraud. To date in FY 2009, the Department of Justice has recovered close to one billion dollars in health care fraud cases, and has obtained 300 convictions.

Last week, the government announced that its Medicare Fraud Strike Force has charged twenty California defendants with $26 million in Medicare fraud from the sale of durable medical equipment (DME). That same week, the government charged six Houston area residents with participating in a scheme to submit claims to Medicare for medically unnecessary DME.

DME fraud and abuse are frequently reported in the calls we receive in representing "whistleblowers" under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. The nation's major whistleblower law, the False Claims Act allows private citizens who report fraud or false claims to share in the government's recovery of damages.

Significant changes to the False Claims Act made earlier this year will improve its effectiveness in stopping fraud against taxpayer funds.

Defrauding the government of taxpayer dollars has gotten tougher over the past five months.

Important changes to the nation's primary anti-fraud statute, the False Claims Act, took effect on May 20, 2009, when the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 became law.

Among the most significant changes, Congress clarified and corrected the False Claims Act by legislatively overruling certain court decisions that sought to limit the scope of the Act, including Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders, 128 S. Ct. 2123 (2008); United States ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp., 380 F.3d 488 (D.C. Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1032 (2005); and United States ex rel. DRC, Inc. v. Custer Battles, LLC, 376 F. Supp. 2d 617 (E.D. Va. 2005), rev'd, 562 F.3d 295 (4th Cir. 2009).

These important 2009 changes to the False Claims Act include the following:

1. The amendments expand the definition of "claim," and fraud directed against government contractors, grantees and other recipients is now plainly covered by the law.

2. Funds administered by the United States government (such as in Iraq) are now protected.

3. Retaining overpayments of money from the government is now an explicit basis of liability, which will be a source of concern for health care providers, among others.

4. Liability for "conspiracy" to violate the Act is broader than before.

5. Protection of whistleblowers and others against "retaliation" now extends not only to "employees," but also to "contractors" and "agents"; and persons other than "employers" potentially may be liable for retaliation.

6. In investigating, the government now has authority to use "Civil Investigative Demands" more broadly, and to share information more with state and local authorities and with whistleblowers/relators.

7. A standard definition of what is "material" now applies in False Claims Act cases.

8. The statute of limitations has been clarified to allow the government to assert its own claims, after the whistleblower (or "relator") has filed a qui tam case under the False Claims Act.

Click here for a detailed discussion of the False Claims Act and the wave of new State False Claims Acts.

The amended False Claims Act is reprinted below, in its entirety:

Continue reading "New False Claims Act Amendments Strengthen Enforcement of Health Care Fraud and Procurement Fraud Laws " »

At the "Advanced Health Law" seminar on October 9, attorneys prosecuting and defending cases of alleged health care fraud will discuss the important new amendments to the False Claims Act. I am honored to be the panelist who will discuss these important new provisions from the perspective of representing whistleblowers (known as "relators") who bring qui tam whistleblower cases under the False Claims Act.

These significant changes to the False Claims Act took effect on May 20, 2009, when the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 became law. Among the most important changes, Congress corrected and clarified the False Claims Act by legislatively overruling certain court decisions that sought to limit the scope of the Act, including Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders, 128 S. Ct. 2123 (2008); United States ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp., 380 F.3d 488 (D.C. Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1032 (2005); and United States ex rel. DRC, Inc. v. Custer Battles, LLC, 376 F. Supp. 2d 617 (E.D. Va. 2005), rev'd, 562 F.3d 295 (4th Cir. 2009).

The False Claims Act, as amended, now has these provisions:

1. The amendments expand the definition of "claim," and fraud directed against government contractors, grantees and other recipients is now covered by the law.

2. Funds administered by the United States government (such as in Iraq) are now protected.

3. Retaining overpayments of money from the government is now an explicit basis of liability, which will be a source of concern for health care providers, among others.

4. Liability for "conspiracy" to violate the Act is broader than before.

5. Protection of whistleblowers and others against "retaliation" now extends not only to "employees," but also to "contractors" and "agents"; and persons other than "employers" potentially may be held liable for retaliation.

6. In investigating, the government now has authority to use "Civil Investigative Demands" more broadly, and to share information more with state and local authorities and with whistleblowers/relators.

7. A standard definition of what is "material" now applies in False Claims Act cases.

8. The statute of limitations has been clarified to allow the government to assert its own claims.

Health care fraud lawyers on this October 9 panel include government counsel Christopher J. Huber (Assistant U.S. Attorney, Atlanta); defense counsel Richard L. ("Rick") Shackelford (King & Spalding LLP, Atlanta); and this whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan (Finch McCranie, LLP, Atlanta). Our moderator will be Summer H. Martin (McKenna Long Aldridge LLP, Atlanta). The program will be chaired by Tracy M. Field, Chair, Health Law Section, State Bar of Georgia (Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, Atlanta). I look forward to working with this distinguished group.

These health care attorneys will discuss which aspects of the amendments to the False Claims Act will be most significant to hospitals, physicians, pharmaceutical companies, and others in the health care industry.

It has been interesting to discuss with our colleagues which of the changes are likely to have the greatest impact, not only in health care fraud cases, but in cases involving contractor fraud in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and reconstruction, other military contracts, NASA programs, Hurricane Katrina and other disaster relief, the new TARP and "Stimulus" programs (the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act), and other federal contracts, which are among the cases clients have brought to our firm.

In one of two prominent whistleblower cases in the news this week, whistleblower John Kopchinski will be awarded more than $50 million for his role in exposing improper "off-label marketing" of the drug Bextra by Pfizer. Other whistleblowers also will be rewarded because of this settlement. That settlement of $2.3 billion is the largest in history ($1 billion to settle False Claims Act allegations, and $1.3 billion in criminal fine and forfeiture).

As large as the Pfizer settlement is, the other whistleblower's actions seem likely to lead to recovery of dollars that could dwarf this $2.3 billion settlement. UBS whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld has lifted the shroud of secrecy from thousands of American taxpayers' offshore accounts at UBS. He has given the IRS a foothold into recovering potentially many billions in unpaid taxes owed.

Yet Birkenfeld was recently sentenced to serve 40 months in federal prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States in a tax fraud scheme while at UBS. His conviction also calls into question his ability to receive a reward under the IRS Whistleblower Program from the billions to be collected by the IRS.

How could this happen?

There are tried and true steps lawyers representing whistleblowers must take to protect their clients from the risk of prosecution. This was one of the topics of the "IRS Whistleblower Boot Camp" panel discussion that I led this past March, with panelists including IRS Whistleblower Office Director Steve Whitlock--how to protect the whistleblower who has potential criminal liability, but who has valuable information.

If adequate protection cannot be obtained, often the whistleblower with real criminal exposure should choose not to go forward. If the information is important enough to the government, however, protection for the whistleblower often can be negotiated, so long as the whistleblower is truthful and forthcoming. As former federal prosecutors who have also defended clients in white collar criminal prosecutions, we have represented many clients in obtaining this type of protection.

Continue reading "Protecting Whistleblowers from Criminal Prosecution: The Mystery of the UBS Whistleblower's Prison Sentence" »

We have followed closely the trend of states enacting their own versions of the nation's chief whistleblower law the False Claims Act. North Carolina has become the newest state to enact its own False Claims Act, which is reprinted below.

We congratulate the State of North Carolina on a momentous accomplishment.

Continue reading "Latest State "False Claims Act" Is Enacted in North Carolina" »

At the 20th Annual Convention of NELA, the National Employment Lawyers Association, I recently had the pleasure of moderating a panel discussion of some of the country's top "whistleblower" lawyers. The topic was "The Most Pressing Issues in Representing Whistleblowers."

Joining me in this panel discussion were Richard Renner and David J. Marshall. Richard is an attorney with Kohn & Colapinto in Washington, DC. and also serves as Legal Director of the National Whistleblowers Center. David is a partner with Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP in DC.

The discussion included:

(1) the brand new Amendments to the False Claims Act that became law on May 20, 2009;

(2) "winning" cases and clients;

(3) what documents and other evidence may lawfully be gathered;

(4) protecting clients who may have been forced to participate in unlawful acts, and who therefore may face liability or prosecution themselves; and

(5) presenting cases most effectively to capture the government's interest.

In addition, we discussed the new IRS Whistleblower Program, in this second consecutive year that NELA invited me to participate in its national convention's panel discussion of whistleblower issues. Audience members had many excellent questions during and after the discussion.

After our session, my friend Mark Kleiman led a discussion of whistleblower issues entitled "The California False Claims Act & Other Whistleblower Cases." Joining Mark were J. Bernard Alexander III and Wilmer J. Harris.

Much thanks to NELA's fine Board and Executive Director Teri Chaw in arranging this terrific conference in Rancho Mirage, California.

New legislation to combat financial institution fraud, securities fraud, mortgage fraud, and other fraud and abuse is gaining momentum, and brings closer long-needed amendments to restore to its intended strength the nation's major "whistleblower" law, the False Claims Act.

The Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (S. 386) received support yesterday in a statement from the Administration:

The Administration strongly supports enactment of S. 386. Its provisions would provide Federal investigators and prosecutors with significant new criminal and civil tools and resources that would assist in holding accountable those who have committed financial fraud.

Specifically, the legislative enhancements would help the Department of Justice to combat mortgage fraud, securities and commodities fraud, money laundering and related offenses, and to protect taxpayer money that has been expended on recent economic stimulus and rescue packages. Further, the legislation would amend the False Claims Act (FCA) in several important respects so that the FCA remains a potent and useful weapon against the misuse of taxpayer funds. In general, this legislation would benefit U.S. taxpayers by both addressing existing fraud and deterring waste, fraud, and abuse of public funds. Moreover, S. 386 would provide needed resources to strained law enforcement agencies and prosecutors that would enable the Department and its partners to advance the pace and reach of the enforcement response to the current economic crisis. These additional resources will provide a return on investment through additional fines, penalties, restitution, damages, and forfeitures. With the tools and resources that S. 386 provides, the Department of Justice and others would be better equipped to address the challenges that face this Nation in difficult economic times and to do their part to help the Nation respond to this challenge.

We have written previously about the amendments to restore the False Claims Act to full strength, by clarifying various provisions that led some courts to weaken this important anti-fraud law.

The abuses now being exposed in the financial industry join the list of many other types of fraud designed to steal taxpayer funds--health care fraud,defense procurement fraud (especially in Iraq and Afghanistan), Hurricane Katrina fraud, and many other species of fraud and false claims.

With hundreds on billions of new federal spending underway in the TARP program and other "bailout" and "stimulus" efforts, the need is urgent to protect these funds with the most effective anti-fraud measures. That protection begins with the amendments to the False Claims Act, and we applaud this bipartisan effort to restore that critical law to its original intent.

I am very excited about co-chairing the Annual "Whistleblower Law Symposium" once again this week.

From Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, San Antonio, and Washington, D.C., many of the country's leading attorneys in whistleblower cases under the "qui tam" statute, the False Claims Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley statute, and the IRS Whistleblower Program will gather in Atlanta on March 4 to discuss some of the more challenging aspects of representing whistleblowers (or defending against whistleblower claims) under these laws.

We are honored to have one of the officials of the IRS Whistleblower Office, Dawn Applebaum, join us in person to discuss the progress of the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program. The IRS Whistleblower Office has just celebrated its second anniversary.

We are also privileged to have the top state enforcement officials in health care fraud cases from Texas, Florida, and Georgia, to explain how they coordinate state and federal health care fraud whistleblower cases under the federal and state False Claims Acts.

Also joining us is Rep. Edward Lindsey, the Legislative Sponsor both of the Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act, and recent legislation to solidify Georgia’s Office of State Inspector General.

Because of the wave of new whistleblower statutes that have been inspired by the successes of the False Claims Act, our firm instituted the Whistleblower Law Symposium. Once again, top-notch speakers will address a broad variety of issues that arise under these whistleblower laws, including:

--Whistleblowers in Health Care: Recent Cases and Strategies for Healthcare Providers and Counsel When a Whistleblower Calls

--Recent Developments in Qui Tam Cases Under the False Claims Act—The Relator’s Perspective

--Update on the IRS Whistleblower Program

We are fortunate to have such excellent faculty members from around the country join us. Our faculty members and their topics are listed below.

Continue reading "Whistleblower Attorneys to Discuss Qui Tam Cases Under False Claims Act, IRS Whistleblower Program, and Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Cases at Annual "Whistleblower Law Symposium"" »

Hidden schemes to defraud Medicare and state Medicaid programs of scarce taxpayer dollars are at the heart of many whistleblower cases under the federal and state False Claims Acts.

This morning, Wisconsin Attorney General J. B. Van Hollen announced that a Dane County, Wisconsin jury has just declared that a pharmaceutical manufacturer defrauded the Wisconsin Medicaid program by reporting grossly inflated and fraudulent prices.

Pfizer was on the receiving end of the health care fraud verdict, which may result in more than $153 million in damages based on alleged practices by Pharmacia (which Pfizer had acquired). The AG reportedly cited a 1993 internal memo in which a pharma employee wrote that "three decades of gaming the present reimbursement scheme has provided a lucrative avenue of profit."

"We as taxpayers, we as consumers, are not going to put up with being 'gamed' by anyone - no matter how big, no matter how small," Van Hollen said.

The case continues the trend of "Average Wholesale Price" litigation (AWP), alleging that drug manufacturers are defrauding state Medicaid programs by publishing false average wholesale prices for their products, in order to grossly overcharge these public programs for drugs. At least 27 states have sued pharmaceutical manufacturers over alleged AWP violations. Alabama has already obtained jury verdicts against three companies of approximately $330 million.

As an example, Wisconsin reportedly argued that Pharmacia listed the wholesale price of its anti-breast cancer drug Adriamycin at $241.36, when in fact it sold the drug to providers wholesale for as little as $33.43. Pharmacia then reportedly "marketed the spread" of $207.93 to oncology providers--a large profit margin.

As Wisconsin argued, the wider the "spread," the more probable a doctor or pharmacy is to increase sales of the drug.

We congratulate the Wisconsin Attorney General's Office on recovering these taxpayer funds.

In our former life as lawyers defending False Claims Act cases, our defendant clients had to consider whether the payments made to settle qui tam cases under the False Claims Act were deductible for tax purposes, and to what extent.

The IRS recently issued a paper on the subject: whether a defendant's payment to the Department of Justice to resolve False Claims Act allegations is "deductible in its entirety as a section 162(a) ordinary and necessary business expense, or includes non-deductible penalty amounts under section 162(f)."

This paper, LMSB-4-0908-045, is reproduced below:

Continue reading "IRS Addresses Deductibility of Payments by Defendants to Settle False Claims Act Cases" »

The wave of new State False Claims Acts has generated a flurry of letters from the Office of Inspector General of HHS this past week. OIG has now "approved" the new State False Claims Acts of California, Georgia, Indiana, and Rhode Island, but has "disapproved" those of six other states: Florida, Louisiana, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Mexico, and Oklahoma.

As this whistleblower lawyer blog has written about extensively, Congress has created financial incentives for states to enact their own versions of the highly successful qui tam whistleblower law, the False Claims Act, which is the government's primary tool for combating fraud directed at taxpayer funds.

Under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, each state that has a False Claims Act that is at least as effective in facilitating and rewarding qui tam actions as the Federal False Claims Act in protecting state Medicaid funds is entitled to a greater share of fraud recoveries from those actions.

OIG must "approve" the state's whistleblower law for the state to be eligible for the additional funds. In effect, states may enact laws with stronger or more effective provisions than the federal False Claims Act, but cannot enact a "weaker" or less effective version of the False Claims Act and still receive the increased funds.

You can read here OIG's analysis of the problems it found with the False Claims Acts of Florida, Louisiana, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Mexico, and Oklahoma.

Fortunately, these problems are easily corrected. OIG has now informed these states precisely how their statutes should be amended to entitle them to receive the additional share of fraud recoveries.

At the annual "Continuing Judicial Education" conference in St. Simon's Island, Georgia this week, I was honored to be invited to speak to the assembled judges about the new state False Claims Act in Georgia, the State False Medicaid Claims Act.

As this whistleblower lawyer blog has written about extensively, there is a wave of new state False Claims Acts across the country, as Congress has urged states to replicate the dramatic successes of the federal False Claims Act in stopping those who steal taxpayer funds.

In 2007 and 2008 to date, Georgia, New York, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin have joined the 16 other states that have enacted some version of the False Claims Act.

Because the False Claims Act has unique procedures that are foreign to most lawyers, judges, and courthouse staffs, the focus of the discussion was on how to manage cases under state False Claims Acts.

I am grateful to former Chief Judge Stephen Boswell (who has joined our firm as counsel) for his invaluable help in this project.

This past week, more than 450 of the country's best employment lawyers who represent individuals gathered in Atlanta for the National Employment Lawyers Association's Annual Conference.

I had the pleasure of appearing with a group of excellent attorneys on a panel of that discussed "Strategic Thinking in Whistleblower Cases," moderated by Robin Potter of Chicago (who won a major victory last week).

Speakers at the 2008 NELA Conference panel on "Strategic Thinking in Whistleblower Cases" were (front row) David Marshall and Bryan J. Schwartz, and (back row) Michael A. Sullivan and Mark Kleiman.

David Marshall of D.C.'s Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP began by discussing how nesessary whistleblowers are, as well as important considerations in pursuing Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower cases.

Bryan J. Schwartz of Nichols Kaster & Anderson’s office in San Francisco then spoke on strategies in representing federal employees as whistleblowers.

Next, Michael A. Sullivan (this whistleblower lawyer blog author) of Finch McCranie, LLP discussed briefly the trend of new State False Claims Acts, and then explained in greater detail the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program.

Mark A. Kleiman of Santa Monica closed by regaling the audience with lessons he has learned from False Claims Act litigation, in particular from the recent case against Merck that resulted in a huge settlement.

I enjoyed this terrific opportunity to work with and hear from these accomplished lawyers, and thank NELA (especially Terri Chaw and the NELA staff) and my friends at NELA-Georgia for organizing this outstanding conference. I applaud the work not only of my co-panelists at the NELA Conference, but also of the many NELA members who strive tirelessly to obtain justice for their clients.

A wave of new “whistleblower” laws continues, inspired by the successes of the federal False Claims Act. These new laws include (1) state versions of the federal False Claims Act, and (2) the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program. At the same time, in 2008 Congress is considering legislation to strengthen the False Claims Act.

This article focuses on the new state False Claims Acts, which mirror the federal False Claims Act in important respects, but can differ in some significant ways. For employees who report fraud against the government and who face adverse employment actions, these new whistleblower laws may provide substantial relief.

One of the new state whistleblower laws, the Georgia “State False Medical Claims Act,” became law on May 24, 2007. Participating in the signing ceremony with Governor Sonny Perdue were (shown above from left to right) Carrie Downing, Director of Legislative and External Affairs of the Georgia Department of Community Health; Dr. Rhonda Medows, Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Health; Inspector General Doug Colburn; Governor Perdue; Rep. Edward Lindsey, sponsor of the State False Medicaid Claims Act; whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan of Finch McCranie, LLP; and Philip Consuegra, Legislative Assistant to Rep. Lindsey.

These new state False Claims Acts and the federal False Claims Act create civil liability for treble damages and potentially huge penalties for fraud and false claims submitted to the government. They authorize “qui tam” or “whistleblower” lawsuits by employees or other persons, who may share in the government’s recovery, as well as allow employees to recover damages for retaliation. These state False Claims Acts, like the federal Act, have unique procedural requirements that are foreign to most lawyers.

This article explains how the state False Claims Acts work, which itself requires an explanation of the unique and sometimes perplexing federal False Claims Act on which these state Acts are based. This article summarizes the background of the federal False Claims Act, outlines how it operates, and discusses the Act’s increasing use to combat fraud directed at public funds. This article also highlights the important differences between state False Claims Acts and the federal False Claims Act by focusing especially on one example, the new Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act. Finally, this article also compares other states’ False Claims Acts, their retaliation provisions, and some of the recoveries that states have obtained to date.

Continue reading "Whistleblower Lawyer Blog Update: New State False Claims Acts Reward Employees and Other Persons Who Report Fraud " »

The trend of new state False Claims Acts with qui tam whistleblower provisions continues, as Louisiana considers whether to adopt its own version of the federal False Claims Act.

The growing number of state False Claims Acts has been a frequent topic of this whistleblower lawyer blog. In 2007, New York, Georgia, and Oklahoma joined the 16 other states that have enacted versions of the federal False Claims Act, the government's primary weapon for fighting fraud against taxpayers.

New Jersey enacted its new False Claims Act in January 2008. It became the 20th state with such a qui tam whistleblower law.

We applaud Louisiana's progress with its new False Claims Act!

This whistleblower lawyer blog reported earlier that the New Jersey Assembly had passed the New Jersey False Claims Act, which provides incentives to whistleblowers ("relators") to expose fraud affecting state funds--much like the federal False Claims Act does.

Governor Jon Corzine signed the new bill into law yesterday, which makes New Jersey the 20th state to enact a state False Claims Act with qui tam whistleblower provisions similar to those of the federal False Claims Act. (Click here for a detailed explanation of the False Claims Act and why states are passing their own False Claims Acts.)

New Jersey's citizens should be proud that their taxpayer dollars have the additional protection of the new statute. Congratulations to all who accomplished this result!

The wave of new state False Claims Acts with qui tam whistleblower provisions has been a frequent topic of this whistleblower lawyer blog. In 2007, New York, Georgia, and Oklahoma joined the 16 other states that have enacted versions of the federal False Claims Act, the government's primary weapon for fighting fraud against taxpayers.

Today, New Jersey's Assembly unanimously passed the New Jersey State False Claims Act, which upon signature by the Governor will make New Jersey the 20th state to have a state version of the venerable qui tam whistleblower statute.

We congratulate New Jersey for taking the prudent action of passing a state False Claims Act. As we have written about extensively, Congress through the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 has created financial incentives for states that pass such qui tam whistleblower laws that are at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act.

The New Jersey False Claims Act expands on the federal Act. It also includes criminal provisions as well as civil liability for treble damages and civil penalties. The text of the Act passed today is reprinted below:

Continue reading "False Claims Act Passed in New Jersey Continues Trend of New State Qui Tam Whistleblower Statutes" »

2007 has been a most significant year for whistleblowers. The whistleblower lawyer blog attorneys look back on some of the milestones:

1. As soon as Congress authorized the first meaningful IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program to pay tax whistleblowers 15-30% of IRS recoveries from those who violate the tax laws by statue effective on December 20, 2006, beginning in January our whistleblower lawyers submitted some of the first IRS Whistleblower claims in the nation under the new law. Our IRS Whistleblower cases have continued to grow throughout the year.

2. Our IRS whistleblower submissions have led to criminal and civil investigations over tax cheating, and our whistleblower clients are in a position to receive 15-30% of the amount of collected proceeds (including penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts) recovered by the IRS.

3. This Spring, legislative officials requested that one of our whistleblower lawyer blog co-authors help draft a state False Claims Act for Georgia, and then invited him as the only private attorney to testify at the legislative hearings to explain the federal False Claims Act, and how the new state False Claims Act will operate. The new Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act was signed into law on May 24, 2007, and early results show that it already has been effective in uncovering and stopping Medicaid fraud.

Participating in the signing ceremony with Governor Sonny Perdue were (shown above from left to right) Carrie Downing, Director of Legislative and External Affairs of the Georgia Department of Community Health; Dr. Rhonda Medows, Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Health; Inspector General Doug Colburn; Governor Perdue; Rep. Edward Lindsey, sponsor of the State False Medicaid Claims Act; whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan of Finch McCranie, LLP; and Philip Consuegra, Legislative Assistant to Rep. Lindsey.

4. As the new IRS Whistleblower Program took shape during 2007, our whistleblower lawyer blog followed each development to educate the public and other attorneys about the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards.

5. At a national conference sponsored by Taxpayers Against Fraud in September, whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan joined IRS Whistleblower Office Director Stephen Whitlock, Professor Dennis Ventry, and fellow IRS whistleblower attorneys Paul Scott and Erika Kelton for a panel discussion to explain how the new IRS Whistleblower Program will operate.

6. To educate other professionals about developments with the False Claims Act and the wave of new state False Claims Acts, whistleblower lawyer blog attorneys published articles in journals that included Compliance Today, a publication of the Health Care Compliance Association. Our whistleblower lawyer blog attorneys also chaired the Whistleblower Law Symposium, and were invited to lead panel discussions and give presentations at the Southeastern Health Care Fraud Conference and various other conferences.

7. Of course, like other whistleblower law attorneys, our firm has continued to represent whistleblowers to recover damages for fraud in health care programs inclluding Medicare and Medicaid, Hurricane Katrina federal disaster relief, government procurement, and other matters affecting federal and state tax dollars.

We are continually inspired by our clients for their commitment to honesty and integrity in the use of government funds. We look forward to another successful year keeping you informed with this whistleblower lawyer blog!

At a conference on False Claims Act Litigation on November 30, attorneys representing the government, relators or whistleblowers, and defendants gathered to discuss whistleblower law issues. The conference was organized by the law firm of Balch & Bingham LLP.

This whistleblower lawyer blog writer had the pleasure of appearing on a panel with the Chief of the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta, Amy Berne, and with Balch & Bingham's John Markus.

Amy Berne opened with an overview of how the government handles False Claims Act cases, and answered many questions about what affects the government's assessment of an FCA case. It is always informative to be able to ask the chief prosecutor what influences her decisions.

John Markus offered a very interesting perspective on compliance issues. From 2004 to 2007, John served as Executive Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for HealthSouth Corporation, where he directed the development of a regulatory compliance program as part of a comprehensive restructuring initiative. He also negotiated and directed the implementation of Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services.

This whistleblower lawyer spoke on some of the reasons whistleblowers come forward and report fraud; goals in representing whistleblowers or relators; and new legal developments such as the wave of new State False Claims Acts, and proposed dramatic changes to the federal False Claims Act.

I appreciated the opportunity to join this group of accomplished lawyers, and thank Balch & Bingham's Mike Bowers, Rich Saunders, John Markus, and Christopher S. Anulewicz for organizing the seminar.

Our whistleblower lawyer blog attorneys have written extensively about Georgia’s enactment of the new State False Medicaid Claims Act, a new whistleblower law that an attorney with our law firm helped enact. This qui tam whistleblower law has applicability to anyone who files a false or fraudulent claim for reimbursement with the State’s Medicaid program.

A classic example of this would be filing false claims for reimbursement for unnecessary and/or unauthorized laboratory tests. If a health care provider submits false or fraudulent claims for reimbursement under the State Medicaid program for performing lab tests which are not properly authorized by a medical physician, or do not otherwise meet Medicaid standards for reimbursement, such a submission could constitute a false claim against the Medicaid program, thus entitling any whistleblower reporting that claim to a reward for reporting Medicaid fraud. One such case, recently filed by the State of Massachusetts, indicates just how expensive such claims may be for the taxpayer.

Last week, in Boston, Boston Clinical Laboratories, Inc. was alleged to have submitted 66,000 false Medicaid claims for urine drug screens in circumstances where they were not ordered by an authorized prescriber or were ordered for non-medical purposes. According to allegations made by the Massachusetts Attorney General, many of these laboratory urine screens were to monitor sobriety tests for the individuals and were not approved for medical reasons. Under state regulations, eligible Medicaid claims are limited to laboratory services prescribed by a physician and must serve a medically necessary purpose. Court ordered and Social Service Agency drug testing, as well as testing for resident sobriety in out-patient treatment facilities, are not covered under the Medicaid program.

While we do not know whether the allegations against Boston Clinical Laboratories, Inc. are true, the fact remains that the case indicates just how expensive unauthorized laboratory tests could be for taxpayers. If laboratories are submitting false claims for reimbursement under the State Medicaid program and if the claims being submitted are not properly approved or authorized, this could constitute a claim under the applicable State False Claims Act for which a whistleblower/informant could receive a reward.

Procedurally, a False Medicaid Claims Act Complaint alleging Medicaid fraud must be filed under seal. The State Attorney General is then given adequate opportunity to investigate the case to determine whether the State wishes to intervene in the lawsuit and take it over as a case that the Attorney General will prosecute. If the State intervenes, the whistleblower is still entitled to a recovery out of any eventual settlement or judgment obtained. In those cases in which the State does not intervene, the whistleblower and his or her counsel can proceed nonetheless in the name of the State and receive an even greater percentage of any recovery assuming fraud is demonstrated. In any event, obviously, fraud needs to be exposed in whatever form it takes.

The claims filed against Boston Clinical Laboratories, Inc. represent merely one type of claim that can be pursued under a State’s False Claims Act. Because Medicaid fraud is such a national problem one must consider just how significant false laboratory claim are in reality. The problem could be huge particularly if only one provider can submit 66,000 claims just for urine screens!

Your whistleblower lawyer blog attorneys are proud to announce that a retired judge has joined their firm, Finch McCranie, LLP, to assist in representing their clients.

Stephen E. Boswell, former Chief Judge of Clayton County Superior Court in the metro Atlanta, Georgia area, has joined the firm as "counsel."

Judge Boswell recently retired from the Superior Court bench after serving 13 years as a Superior Court Judge, over two periods of service since 1982. Previously, he was in private practice in the Atlanta area for 16 years, with a variety of experience in civil and criminal jury trials.

As of Oct. 1, 2007, he has become “counsel” to Finch McCranie and will assist the firm’s attorneys and clients in, among other things, qui tam “whistleblower” cases under the federal False Claims Act and the state False Claims Acts, and claims under the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program.

“I am excited to be joining a group of excellent lawyers who have earned an outstanding reputation over decades for representing their clients with integrity to great success,” Judge Boswell said. “Finch McCranie is one of the most well-respected firms around, and I have known its lawyers both for the quality of their work and for their character in representing clients in my court. I am pleased to be able to help represent those clients now.”

“Our firm is proud to have Judge Boswell join our practice,” said Richard W. Hendrix, partner in the firm. “He brings a wealth of knowledge and experience from having been in involved in literally hundreds of trials over his career. “He’ll be an invaluable resource for our clients. No one knows how to try a case any better than Judge Boswell, and that experience also will benefit all of our clients.”

Judge Boswell, a native of Hogansville, Georgia, is a 1974 graduate of the University of Georgia Law School. Before completing his legal education, he served as a U.S. Army officer and was awarded a Bronze Star in Vietnam. In addition to his years on the trial court bench, Judge Boswell has been appointed to sit specially on the Georgia Supreme Court, has taught courses at the American Bar Association's National Judicial College, and is a former President of the Clayton County Bar Association.

Judge Boswell also has served on the Boards of Heritage Bank and of many community organizations, including as Chairman of the board of the Salvation Army. He has also successfully acted as a mediator in bringing many cases to resolution. He has elected not to accept cases as a Senior Superior Court Judge at this time.

As former federal prosecutors who prosecuted fraud against the government and have tried many cases, we are thrilled to add Judge Boswell's expertise in evaluating cases for trial to the services we provide our whistleblower clients. In addition, his civil and criminal trial experience and our experience in defending white collar criminal cases are a huge advantage to whistleblower clients who need to evaluate whether they have any exposure or liability themselves.

Finch McCranie, LLP is an “all-litigation” trial practice law firm with more than 40 years of continuous practice. The firm's main office is in Atlanta, Georgia. It holds numerous records, including the first million dollar jury verdict in the state. The firm’s practice includes representation of citizens who report fraud against the government, including qui tam "relators" or whistleblowers under the False Claims Act and the state False Claims Acts, as well as IRS tax whistleblowers. Members of the firm also testified in legislative hearings and helped draft one of the nation's newest qui tam “whistleblower” statutes, Georgia's new State False Medicaid Claims Act in 2007.

To assist those who want to know more details about the nation's primary whistleblower law, the False Claims Act, as well as the wave of new state qui tam whistleblower laws that mirror the False Claims Act, the whistleblower lawyer blog attorneys are pleased to present this detailed article. A version of this article by whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan has just been published in the October 2007 Georgia Bar Journal, and is reprinted here in updated form with permission of the Bar Journal.

For ease of reading, we have divided this detailed article into six parts:

1. Introduction: The False Claims Act and How It Has Inspired a Wave of State Qui Tam Whistleblower Laws

2. The Basics: The False Claims Act and the Growing Number of State False Claims Acts With Qui Tam Whistleblower Provisions

3. Background and History of the False Claims Act

4. The Modern False Claims Act--How It Works

5. The Successes of the Modern False Claims Act--and How They Have Prompted a Wave of State False Claims Acts With Qui Tam Whistleblower Provisions

6. The State False Claims Acts: Qui Tam Whistleblower Laws That Seek to Repeat the Successes of the Federal False Claims Act

We hope that you find useful and informative our article on the False Claims Act and the new state False Claims Acts. If you have any questions, please feel free to call us at 800-228-9159, or email us through our website link here.

This article is reprinted with permission of the Georgia Bar Journal.

Copyright © 2007 by Finch McCranie, LLP

This Part 6 is the final installment by whistleblower lawyer blog of an article explaining why the major qui tam whistleblower statutes, the federal False Claims Act, has led to a wave of new state False Claims Acts. It is part of a recently published article by whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan, and this article is reprinted with the permission of the Georgia Bar Journal.

This Part 6 describes the new state whistleblower laws and how states have fared to date in recovering taxpayer money wrongfully through fraud and false claims. It also discusses some interesting new approaches that some states have taken in improving on the federal False Claims Act with their own statutes.

V. Other States’ Experiences With Their Own False Claims Acts

As noted, in 2007 Georgia, New York, and Oklahoma joined the 16 other states that have a False Claims statute, and at least a dozen other states are considering similar laws. [58] The financial incentives of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 have not only prompted states that had lacked False Claims statutes to enact them, but also have caused many states wishing to qualify for the additional funds to amend their existing False Claims statutes.

In essence, while states may enact “tougher” or more comprehensive laws than the federal False Claims Act, states with “weaker” or less effective laws—as judged by the standards of the Deficit Reduction Act—will not qualify for the additional funds. [59]

Seven of the first ten states whose statutes were scrutinized by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) quickly learned this lesson when OIG disapproved their state statutes. [60] These included California (which lacked a minimum penalty), Florida (which omitted “fraudulent” from its definition of claims), Indiana (which did not make defendants liable for “deliberate ignorance” and “reckless disregard”), Louisiana (which did not permit the state to intervene in cases, set too low a percentage for whistleblowers to recover, and set no minimum penalty), Michigan (which omitted penalties and liability for decreasing or avoiding an obligation to pay the government, i.e., a “reverse false claim”), Nevada (which had a statute of limitations too short and a minimum penalty too low), and Texas (which did not permit the whistleblower to litigate the case if the state did not, and which provided for lower percentage shares to whistleblowers and lower penalties). Most of these states have gone back to the drawing board to correct these deficiencies.

In sum, the Deficit Reduction Act has set minimum standards for state False Claims Acts for states wishing to receive these additional funds. In plain English, the state laws must protect at least Medicaid funds, and they must be at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act, especially in rewarding and facilitating qui tam actions for false or fraudulent claims, with damages and penalties no less than those under the federal Act. [61]

A. How Other States’ False Claims Acts Compare to the New Georgia Statute

Many state False Claims laws have been in transition in 2007. States whose laws have been “disapproved” by OIG have begun to amend their statutes to meet the requirements for obtaining the additional funds under the Deficit Reduction Act, as Florida and Texas already have done in 2007. While these laws are in flux, some significant differences from Georgia’s new State False Medicaid Claims Act are likely to remain.

First, the majority of state False Claims statutes protect the state’s funds generally, rather than protecting only state Medicaid funds, as Georgia’s new State False Medicaid Claims Act is limited. Just as the federal False Claims Act is not limited to health care fraud, but encompasses fraud against the government generally (except for Internal Revenue violations, which are now covered by the new IRS Whistleblower program), [62] many states have used these statutes to protect public funds in general from fraud. Those states include California, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, Oklahoma, Virginia, and Tennessee.

In addition, several states—including Hawaii, Massachusetts, Nevada and Tennessee— have expanded on the federal Act’s four commonly-used theories of liability listed above. These state laws create a new legal theory for holding liable a person or entity who is the “beneficiary” of the “inadvertent submission” of a false or fraudulent claim, if that person or entity fails to disclose (and presumably correct) the false claim after discovering it. [63]

Moreover, Tennessee’s False Claims Act reaches beyond false or fraudulent “claims” and imposes liability for false or fraudulent “conduct” that apparently does not necessarily involve “claims” submitted to the state. This state law adds a new category of liability for “any false or fraudulent conduct, representation, or practice in order to procure anything of value directly or indirectly from the state or any political subdivision.” [64]

Because states have this leeway under the Deficit Reduction Act to pass laws that may be “tougher” or more “effective” than the federal Act, some states have set the statutory penalties higher than the federal level of $5,500 to $11,000 per claim. For instance, under the New York law enacted in 2007, penalties range from $6,000 to $12,000 for each false or fraudulent claim. [65]

Some other states authorize a higher percentage of the state’s recovery that a relator (whistleblower) may receive, instead of the percentages that the federal False Claims Act authorizes (which the Georgia statute also uses): 15-25% of the recovery in cases in which the government intervenes, and 25-30% in cases in which the government does not intervene. For example, Nevada’s percentages are 15-33% in intervened cases, and 25-50% in non-intervened cases; Tennessee’s are 25-33% in intervened cases and 35-50% in non-intervened cases; and Montana’s range from 15-50%. [66]

B. Notable Results Obtained by States Under Their False Claim Statutes

Most qui tam cases filed under the state False Claims statutes have related to health care. Many are “global” Medicaid cases that were first developed in federal courts as Medicare and Medicaid fraud cases and that concerned a nationwide fraud which had been investigated by multiple federal and state jurisdictions. [67] Each state that enacts a False Claims Act that meets the minimum requirements is in a position to join the process.

Most of the state settlements have come from “piggy backing” on federal law enforcement efforts and from joining in global settlements. [68] Experience with some of the newer state statutes is too recent to evaluate, but many states have reported the desire for more resources to develop such cases. [69]

Texas’s experience is worth special mention because the Texas Attorney General’s Office has been especially effective in pursuing cases involving false claims in health care. Texas’s statute has allowed it to recover more than $216 million in health care fraud cases since 1999.

Because the Texas Attorney General’s Office has been a leader in recovering damages for health care fraud by using the Texas statute, it was perhaps ironic that OIG initially “disapproved” the highly successful Texas law before it was amended in 2007 to comply with the Deficit Reduction Act standards. [70]

California, whose statute is not limited to health care, recovered $43.1 million in 2005 in a state False Claims action alleging fraud in the installation and monitoring of heating and cooling equipment in San Francisco schools. [71] In 2001, California recovered $31.9 million in an action alleging fraudulent billing during construction of the Los Angeles subway system. [72] Similarly, California recovered $30 million in 2000 in a matter alleging the knowing sale of defective computers to the state and political subdivisions. In 1998, California recovered $187 million in an action alleging the improper retention of unclaimed municipal bonds. [73]

We do not know with any precision the dollar amount of fraud that affects any particular state's government spending, or how much of that fraud can be prevented through effective use of a state False Claims Act. For now, New York, Oklahoma, and Georgia have joined the list of states that will see how much of at least their Medicaid fraud losses can be recovered through the new state False Claims Acts.

Conclusion

We hope that our article on the False Claims Act and the new state False Claims Acts has been useful. If you would like, please feel free to call us to discuss any questions you may have at 800-228-9159, or email us through our website link here (or directly to msullivan@finchmccranie.com.)

Continue reading "Part 6: The State False Claims Acts: Qui Tam Whistleblower Laws That Seek to Repeat the Successes of the Federal False Claims Act " »

This is Part 5 of 6 by whistleblower lawyer blog of a detailed article for those wishing to know more about the principal qui tam whistleblower statutes, the federal False Claims Act and the new state False Claims Acts. It is part of a recently published article by whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan, and this article is reprinted with the permission of the Georgia Bar Journal.

This Part 5 discusses the dramatic successes of the federal False Claims Act since its 1986 Amendments in recovering taxpayers' money wrongfully obtained by fraud and false claims.

IV. The Trend of Recent Recoveries Under the False Claims Act

Over the past two decades since the modern False Claims Act was established through the 1986 Amendments, the federal government’s recoveries of dollars have grown astronomically, especially in health care cases. The Department of Justice statistics [52] tell the story:

In 1987, the government’s recoveries in qui tam cases totaled zero, presumably because the 1986 Amendments had just taken effect; and total recoveries under the False Claims Act were just $86 million. The following year, qui tam and other False Claims Act settlements and judgments began a steady climb upward, exceeding $200 million by 1989, and $300 million by 1991. By 1994, the government’s recoveries broke the $1 billion mark for the first time, with $380 million of that amount attributable to qui tam case recoveries alone.

In 2000, the government recovered more than $1.5 billion, of which $1.2 billion was derived from qui tam actions. In 2001, the government recovered more than $1.7 billion, with almost $1.2 billion of that amount from qui tam cases. With the exception of 2004, in each year since 2000 the government has recovered more than a billion dollars per year under the False Claims Act, and qui tam actions were responsible for the lion’s share of those recoveries. For example, in 2003, government recoveries exceeded $2.2 billion, of which $1.4 billion came from qui tam cases. Similarly, in 2005, of the government’s total recovery of $1.4 billion, $1.1 billion of that amount came from qui tam cases.

In 2006, the Justice Department recovered a record of more than $3.1 billion in settlements and judgments for fraud and false claims. Of this record $3.1 billion in recoveries, 72% came from the health care field; 20% from defense; and 8% from other sources. Health care alone accounted for $2.2 billion in settlements and judgments, which included a $920 million settlement with Tenet Healthcare Corporation, the country’s second-largest hospital chain. Defense procurement fraud amounted to $609 million in recoveries, which included a $565 million settlement with the Boeing Company.

It is interesting that, while defense procurement fraud both inspired the Act and was the largest source of recoveries at the time of the 1986 Amendments, health care cases now lead in recoveries, as health care costs have grown as a percentage of the federal budget. By industry, in 1987 the defense industry was the largest source of cases under the False Claims Act. [53] The health care industry accounted for only 12% of cases under the False Claims Act in 1987; that percentage grew to 54% by 1997. [54]

Many health care fraud cases have addressed over-billing or up-coding, fraudulent cost reporting, billing for services not provided, and failure to furnish the required “quality of care.” [55] The breakdown of the Department of Justice statistics shows that government recoveries in the health care field have grown from less than $2 million in 1988 to more than $1.8 billion in 2003. Although the amounts recovered rise and fall each year, from 2001–2006 government recoveries from the health care field exceeded $1 billion in five out of six years.

The trend has continued in 2007, as the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services recently announced that it expects $2.9 billion in recoveries for Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health and human services programs for the first half of fiscal year 2007. [56]

In short, the health care industry now consistently accounts for the vast majority of settlements and judgments obtained by the federal government for fraud and false claims.

Continue reading "Part 5: The False Claims Act's Successes--and How They Have Prompted a Wave of State False Claims Acts With Qui Tam Whistleblower Provisions" »

This Part 4 by whistleblower lawyer blog is a continuation of a detailed article for those wishing to know the specifics of the principal qui tam whistleblower statutes, the federal False Claims Act and the new state False Claims Acts. It is taken from a recently published article by whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan, and it is reprinted with the permission of the Georgia Bar Journal.

This Part 4 focuses on the "modern" False Claims Act--since the 1986 Amendments. Before considering it, please note that, in September 2007, a bipartisan group of Senators introduced the "False Claims Act Correction Act," a bill to further "modernize" the False Claims Act with substantial improvements intended to restore the Act to Congress' original intentions. We at whistleblower lawyer blog will provide regular updates as that bill is considered by Congress.

III. Overview of How the Modern False Claims Act Works (with Comparisons to State False Claims Acts, With the New Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act as a Primary Example)

A. Conduct Prohibited

The federal False Claims Act imposes civil liability under several different theories, only four of which are generally used:

First, the Act makes liable any person who knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a “false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval” to the federal government. [30] “Claim” is broadly defined to include not only submissions made directly to the federal government, but also “any request or demand . . . for money or property” made to a “contractor, grantee, or other recipient” if the federal government provides any portion of the money or property in question. [31]

Second, the Act creates liability for using a “false record or statement” to obtain payment of a false claim. It imposes liability on any person who “knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the government.” [32]

Third, the False Claims Act imposes liability under a “conspiracy” provision. Any person who “conspires to defraud the Government by getting a false or fraudulent claim allowed or paid” is also liable under the Act. [33]

Fourth, since the government also can be defrauded when a private entity underpays or avoids paying an obligation to the government, the modern Act contains what is known as a “reverse false claim” provision. It creates liability for any person who “knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the Government.” [34] For example, a company that is obligated to pay royalties to the government under an oil lease can be held liable if it uses false records or statements to pay less than what it owes.

Georgia Act compared: The same bases of liability are set forth in new section 49-4-168.1(a), with regard to the Georgia Medicaid program. “Claim” is also broadly defined in the Georgia statute in section 49-4-168(1). In fact, the Georgia statute’s definition of “claim” was intended by the legislature to eliminate a point of dispute about the federal statute [35] by making clear that it applies to “claims” submitted not only to the government, but also to other persons or entities, as long as the Georgia Medicaid program provides any portion of the money or property at issue.

The federal False Claims Act also creates a cause of action for damages for retaliation against employees who assist in the investigation and prosecution of False Claims Act cases. [36] This cause of action belongs to the employee alone, and the government does not share in any recovery for retaliation.

Georgia Act compared: New section 49-4-168.4 establishes a similar right to pursue a claim for retaliation in employment.

Continue reading "Part 4: The Modern False Claims Act--How It Works" »

This is Part 2 by whistleblower lawyer blog of a detailed overview of the federal False Claims Act and the new state False Claims Acts with qui tam whistleblower provisions. It is based on an article by whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan, and is reprinted with permission of the Georgia Bar Journal.

This Part 2 discusses the sound policy reasons underlying the False Claims Act.

I. Why A “False Claims Act”?

Fraud is perhaps so pervasive and, therefore, costly to the Government due to a lack of deterrence. GAO concluded in its 1981 study that most fraud goes undetected due to the failure of Governmental agencies to effectively ensure accountability on the part of program recipients and Government contractors. The study states:

For those who are caught committing fraud, the chances of being prosecuted and eventually going to jail are slim. . . . The sad truth is that crime against the Government often does pay. [5]

Fraud—and allegations of fraud—plague government spending at every level. Today, as the federal and state governments struggle to fund the billions of dollars spent annually on health care through Medicare and Medicaid; national security and local security efforts; Hurricane Katrina and other disaster relief; and government grants and programs of every description, there is no shortage of opportunities for fraud against the public fisc.

The federal False Claims Act has been the federal government’s “primary” weapon to recover losses from those who defraud it. [6] The Act not only authorizes the government to pursue actions for treble damages and penalties, but also empowers and provides incentives to private citizens to file suit on the government’s behalf as “qui tam relators.” Over the past 20 years, recoveries for the federal government have grown dramatically since Congress amended the Act in 1986 to encourage greater use of the qui tam provisions, as part of a “coordinated effort of both the [g]overnment and the citizenry [to] decrease this wave of defrauding public funds.” [7]

The federal False Claims Act has been successful in recovering billions of dollars, increasingly through qui tam lawsuits brought by private citizens. In light of the federal Act’s successes, Congress in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 [8] created a large financial “carrot” for states that adopt state versions of the False Claims Act. Any state that passes its own “False Claims” statute with qui tam or whistleblower provisions that are at least as effective as those of the federal Act becomes eligible for a 10% increase in its share of Medicaid fraud recoveries. [9]

Thus, Georgia’s and other states' impetus in enacting these new state False Claims Acts in 2007 was this incentive of more dollars. In 2007 to date, Georgia, New York, and Oklahoma have joined the 16 other states that have enacted some version of a “False Claims” statute. [10] At least a dozen other states [11] are considering enacting similar statutes of their own so that they, too, qualify for increased funds under the Deficit Reduction Act.

Continue reading "Part 2: The False Claims Act and the Growing Number of State False Claims Acts With Qui Tam Whistleblower Provisions--the Basics" »

We at whistleblower lawyer blog hope this detailed article assists those interested in the federal False Claims Act and the new state False Claims Acts with qui tam whistleblower provisions. A version of this article by whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan [1] has just been published in the October 2007 Georgia Bar Journal. For ease of reading, we have divided the article in six parts--this is Part 1.

The federal False Claims Act [2] has inspired a wave of new state False Claims Acts with qui tam whistleblower provisions, as the New York False Claims Act, the Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act, and the Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act [3] in 2007 have joined sixteen other state laws that allow qui tam whistleblowers to pursue cases based on fraud and false claims that rob taxpayers' dollars.

These new state qui tam whistleblower laws are critical to stopping fraud against taxpayers. For example, in April 2007, the Georgia Legislature enacted a state version of this important—but commonly misunderstood—federal law, the False Claims Act. The new “State False Medicaid Claims Act” mirrors the federal False Claims Act in important respects, but differs in some significant ways.

Both the state and federal Acts create civil liability for treble damages and potentially huge penalties for fraud and false claims submitted to the government. Both authorize “qui tam” or “whistleblower” lawsuits by private persons, who may share in the government’s recovery. Both have unique procedural requirements that are foreign to most lawyers. Like the federal whistleblower law, most state qui tam whistleblower laws protect all state government funds. A few states such as Georgia have opted for the narrower reach of the Georgia Act, which applies only to fraud or false claims affecting the Georgia Medicaid Program, rather than all State programs.

This article explains how the new state False Claims Acts work, which itself requires an explanation of the unique and sometimes perplexing federal False Claims Act on which the state Acts are based. This article summarizes the background of the federal False Claims Act, outlines how it operates, and discusses the Act’s increasing use to combat fraud directed at public funds. This article also highlights the important differences between the state and federal Acts, using Georgia's as an example. Finally, this article also compares other states’ False Claims Acts and discusses some of the recoveries that other states have obtained to date.

The new Georgia “State False Medical Claims Act” became law on May 24, 2007. Participating in the signing ceremony with Governor Sonny Perdue were (shown above from left to right) Carrie Downing, Director of Legislative and External Affairs of the Georgia Department of Community Health; Dr. Rhonda Medows, Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Health; Inspector General Doug Colburn; Governor Perdue; Rep. Edward Lindsey, sponsor of the State False Medicaid Claims Act; whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan of Finch McCranie, LLP; and Philip Consuegra, Legislative Assistant to Rep. Lindsey.

Footnotes:
1 Michael A. Sullivan has worked with the False Claims Act since the late 1980s and has both defended and prosecuted cases under the False Claims Act. He is the co-author of www.whistleblowerlawyerblog.com. At the request of Georgia legislators, Mr. Sullivan provided input in the drafting of the new Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act and testified in each of those legislative hearings to explain the False Claims Act. His practice includes whistleblower litigation under the False Claims Act and the IRS Whistleblower Program, serious injury litigation, and white collar criminal defense. He is a graduate of the University of North Carolina and Vanderbilt Law School, where he was Senior Articles Editor of the Vanderbilt Law Review. He clerked for U.S. District Judge Marvin H. Shoob in Atlanta from 1984-86. From 1995-98, he served as a federal prosecutor in the Independent Counsel investigation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, including the prosecution of a former Secretary of the Interior. His most recent article appears in the Health Care Compliance Association’s September 2007 edition of Compliance Today, entitled “New State ‘False Claims Acts’: An Executive Summary for Health Care Compliance Professionals.” He also appeared with the Director of the new IRS Whistleblower Office in discussing and explaining the new “IRS Whistleblower Program” in September 2007 at the Taxpayers Against Fraud Annual Conference in Washington.

2 The federal False Claims Act is at 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33.

3 The new Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act is codified at O.C.G.A. §§ 49-4-168 to 49-4-168.6.

Some of the country's leading attorneys in qui tam whistleblower cases and IRS Whistleblower cases will gather for the "First Annual Whistleblower Law Symposium," which will take place at the Georgia State Bar Headquarters on Thursday, September 20, beginning at 9:00 a.m. (See Agenda below). This Whistleblower Law Symposium is organized and co-chaired by the authors of this whistleblower lawyer blog, Michael A. Sullivan and Richard W. Hendrix.

The presenters will include the very successful Pat O’Connell of the Texas Attorney General’s Office, whose group has recovered more than $216 million in health care fraud cases since 1999; and Jim Breen, who has represented relator Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys Inc. in many very substantial qui tam cases, including the action that led to last week’s announcement by DOJ of a settlement with Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc.

In addition, Steve Cowen of King & Spalding, LLP will chair a discussion of issues in defending False Claims Act cases; Marlan Wilbanks and other relators’ counsel will speak as well; and Charlie Richards of the Georgia Attorney General's Office and Georgia’s Inspector General Doug Colburn will discuss the new Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act.

We will also discuss the bill introduced last week by Senators Grassley, Durbin, Specter, and Leahy to make substantial modifications to the federal False Claims Act, the “False Claims Act Correction Act of 2007.” (See http://grassley.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=fac0a482-1321-0e36-ba6f-0150b8a2b182&Month=9&Year=2007).

Further, my partner Richard Hendrix and I will explain and discuss the new IRS Whistleblower Program created by Congress in December 2006. I spent several hours this past week in Washington with the Director of the new IRS Whistleblower Office, Stephen Whitlock, to prepare for and appear in a panel discussion to explain the new IRS Whistleblower Program. I also enjoyed lunch with the lead IRS official responsible for IRS Whistleblower claims in the financial services industry, Stuart Mann, and with Nicole Cammarota, an IRS official who is working on the new regulations. There is a great deal of excitement about this new IRS Whistleblower program, which rewards citizens who report large tax fraud, tax evasion, and other tax law violations to the IRS. (Our firm is pursuing a variety of IRS Whistleblower cases across the country.)

For anyone who believes that taxpayers pay too much to allow fraud against the federal and state governments, these exciting new developments in the law are important.

We are excited to be hosting this Whistleblower Law Symposium, and to discuss recent developments in the False Claims Act, the new state False Claims Acts, and the new IRS Whistleblower Program. The Agenda for the Symposium is below.

Continue reading "Whistleblower Law Attorneys to Gather for Symposium on False Claims Act, State False Medicaid Claims Act, and New IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program" »

Yesterday I enjoyed leading a panel discussion of the new State False Claims Acts, at the Southeastern Health Care Fraud Conference in Atlanta. Of particular interest to this audience was the new Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act that became law in May 2007, which has qui tam whistleblower provisions similar to the federal False Claims Act.

Our audience of health care attorneys heard a detailed account of Florida's successes with its State False Claims Act by Mark S. Thomas, the Chief of Staff and Special Counsel of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. We also learned how the Georgia Attorney General's Office plans to implement the new State False Medicaid Claims Act in remarks by Charles M. Richards, Senior Assistant Attorney General of the Georgia State Health Care Fraud Control Unit.

Other excellent presentations were made in this seminar organized by my friends Steve Cowen of King & Spalding, LLP, and Joe Whitley of Alston & Bird, LLP. I am grateful to Joe and Steve for the opportunity to participate and explain the False Claims Act, the new Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act and other state False Claims Acts, some of which have added interesting new wrinkles to health care compliance, by creating new theories of liability not found in the federal Act. (An article explaining some of the new thoeries of liability that these new State False Claims Acts introduce will appear in the October Georgia Bar Journal.)

To explain in depth this new whistleblower law to attorneys, as well as the federal False Claims Act and the new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program, our firm has already scheduled the "First Annual Whistleblower Law Symposium" in Georgia at the State Bar of Georgia Headquarters in Atlanta on September 20, 2007. We are excited that joining us is the leader of Texas' already hugely successful effort to recover damages for Medicaid fraud, Pat O'Connell, the Chief of the Civil Medicaid Fraud Section of the Texas Office of Attorney General. Other nationally-known speakers will join us as well on September 20.

AARP Applauds State Law to Combat Medicaid Fraud with Qui Tam Whistleblower Approach

We were pleased to see that Florida has joined New York, Georgia, Oklahoma and more than a dozen other states in creating a State False Claims Act with qui tam whistleblower provisions similar to the federal False Claims Act. As we have discussed at length on this whistleblower lawyer blog, Congress has created financial incentives for states to pass whistleblower laws with qui tam provisions to protect Medicaid funds.

Florida's Governor signed the Florida False Claims Act into law on June 28, 2007.

AARP supported the legislation to "preserve scarce resources for Florida's most vulnerable citizens."

The wave of new False Claims Acts is a responsible and cost-effective approach to protecting taxpayer dollars. We congratulate Florida on its new law.

I was excited to be invited to participate in today's signing of the new Georgia "State False Medicaid Claims Act," the newest state qui tam whistleblower law. The bill's sponsor, Rep. Edward Lindsey, asked this whistleblower lawyer blog author to join him and representatives of the Georgia Department of Community Health in the Governor's Office for the signing ceremony.

Having worked with legislators on this bill, I was very happy to celebrate the law's passage today:

Participating in the signing ceremony with Governor Sonny Perdue were (shown above from left to right) Carrie Downing, Director of Legislative and External Affairs of the Georgia Department of Community Health; Dr. Rhonda Medows, Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Health; Inspector General Doug Colburn; Governor Perdue; Rep. Edward Lindsey, sponsor of the State False Medicaid Claims Act; whistleblower lawyer blog author Michael A. Sullivan of Finch McCranie, LLP; and Philip Consuegra, Legislative Assistant to Rep. Lindsey.

With an excellent draft bill already prepared by the State Law Department headed by Attorney General Thurbert Baker and his Senior Assistant AGs Mary Beth Westmoreland and Charlie Richards, I had provided input to Rep. Lindsey on clarifying and improving the bill, before the Legislature considered it. Inspector General Doug Colburn and I then made the rounds through the three legislative committee hearings to explain how the False Claims Act works, and how the new State False Medicaid Claims Act would operate in Georgia.

The new whistleblower law protects the State's Medicaid funds by creating liability for "treble damages" (actual losses multiplied by three), and penalties of $5,500 to $11,000 for each false claim submitted to obtain payment by the State Medicaid Program. It also encourages private citizens who know of fraud in health care to file qui tam whistleblower cases, by permitting the whistleblower to share in up to 30% of the State's recovery of money.

Georgia has joined more than 15 other states that have enacted laws to protect tax dollars used in state programs. New York and Oklahoma likewise enacted their own False Claims Act this year. Congress has encouraged states to pass similar whistleblower laws with provisions that are at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act--the states that do so will receive an extra 10% of Medicaid fraud recoveries (which works out to more than 10% when you do the math, which I will not fo here, but can explain if you email me).

To explain the new law to Georgia attorneys, our firm has already scheduled what will be a great seminar at the State Bar of Georgia Headquarters in Atlanta on September 20, 2007. We are excited that joining us is the leader of Texas' already hugely successful effort to recover damages for Medicaid fraud, Pat O'Connell, the Chief of the Civil Medicaid Fraud Section of the Texas Office of Attorney General. We also have some other excellent speakers.

After today's signing of the new Georgia False Medicaid Claims Act, Rep. Lindsey convinced the Governor to join us for another photo. Left to right are yours truly, Governor Perdue, Rep. Lindsey's Assistant Philip Consuegra, and Rep. Edward Lindsey:

Georgia taxpayers will benefit by this smart new tool that the Legislature has created. It should help deter those who would consider cheating the State Medicaid system by classic fraudulent methods such as over-billing, upcoding, and billing for services not rendered.

There is no reason why Georgia cannot replicate Texas' successes in recovering large damages when, for example, drug companies overcharge or otherwise defraud the State. Many states have taken action against pharmaceutical companies over "off-label" marketing of drugs such as Zyprexa, to recover damages for their Medicaid programs.

We are pleased to see yet another state--Oklahoma--realize how effective qui tam whistleblower laws are by passing a state False Claims Act this week.

The Oklahoma legislature has passed the Oklahoma Medicaid False Claims Act (SB 889). The bill's primary author was Cox Crain.

The new whistleblower law appears to be modelled on the federal False Claims Act. As we have written about often on this whistleblower lawyer blog, states that pass such laws with qui tam whistleblower provisions that are at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act qualify for a 10 point increase in the state's share of Medicaid fraud recoveries.

This incentive created by Congress in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 makes it even more desirable for states to have their own whistleblower laws--a true no-brainer! Congratulations to Oklahoma..

To understand why states are passing their own "False Claims Acts" with qui tam whistleblower provisions, the heath care compliance newsletter Heathcare Auditing Strategies called on one of the authors of this whistleblower lawyer blog, Michael A. Sullivan.

The May 2007 edition of this heath care compliance publication discusses the results of our efforts in this blog to explain these new state statutes, and to report on how these state statutes have fared when reviewed by the Office of Inspector General of HHS. States with false claim statutes with qui tam whistleblower provisions at least as effective as those of the federal False Claims Act are entitled to a 10 point increase in the state's share of Medicaid fraud recoveries.

This well-presented article by Andrea Leptinsky, "Whistleblower laws cause states to scramble for their own," explains to health care compliance and auditing professionals the progression of these new false claims acts, and what it means to them.

Separately, we have also been busy in providing input to legislators to explain and improve the version of the False Claims Act that passed on April 13 in Georgia, the Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act. We have also planned a seminar for September 20 in Atlanta with some nationally known speakers to explain these whistleblower statutes and the new IRS Whistleblower program in which we have been busily working as well--details to follow in future posts on this whistleblower lawyer blog.

Another state whistleblower law, with qui tam provisions that follow the federal False Claims Act, was born today. The Georgia Senate passed the "State False Medicaid Claims Act" today, and it goes to Governor Sonny Perdue for his signature.

We have been writing about this and other new state whistleblower statutes. Representative Edward Lindsey deserves credit for his sponsorship of the bill.

Our firm was fortunate enough to have been part of the legislative effort. Rep. Lindsey asked Michael A. Sullivan (one of this whistleblowerlawyerblog co-authors) to testify and explain the whistleblower law three times, before the House Judiciary Committee and the Senate Insurance and Labor Committee. There were no dissenting votes in any of the committee votes.

New York also recently approved a state False Claims Act, and many other states are considering them.

We look forward to following the progress in other states that are considering state False Claims Acts, so that they take advantage of the financial incentives Congress created in the Deficit Reduction Act.

Continue reading "Another State Qui Tam Whistleblower Law is Born--Georgia Bill Passes Senate and Goes to Governor for Signature" »

A new qui tam whistleblower law has cleared another hurdle toward passage. Georgia's Senate Insurance and Labor Committee unanimously approved the new "State False Medicaid Claims Act" this afternoon. As we have written about previously on this whistleblower lawyer blog, the new whistleblower law has already passed the Georgia House.

After an introduction by Senator Seth Harp, the bill's sponsor, Rep. Edward Lindsey, asked Inspector General Doug Colburn of the Department of Community Health and attorney Michael A. Sullivan (co-author of this whistleblower lawyer blog) of Finch McCranie, LLP to join him in testifying about how the new whistleblower law would work. Rep. Lindsey explained the incentives that Congress has provided to states to enact their own qui tam whistleblower laws, and then asked Sullivan to explain how the law would function.

Sullivan testified about the successes of the federal False Claims Act in not only recovering money from those who have defrauded the government, but also serving as a deterrent to those who might otherwise cheat the public. He explained how the funds recovered have increased dramatically since the 1986 Amendments that created the modern False Claims Act, especially in the health care area. Sullivan also described other states' successes with their own whistleblower statutes, as well as the strict review of state false claims statutes by the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Inspector General Colburn explained to the Senators some of the other major provisions of the bill, and answered questions about the amount of suspected Medicaid fraud in his state. The Senators also questioned Rep. Lindsey, Inspector General Colburn, and Sullivan about how the bill would apply to medical providers in certain examples.

Although representatives of the health care industry were present, none cam forward to speak out against the bill or express any concerns.

The Committee voted unanimously to approve the new whistleblower law. It moves on to the Senate Rules Committee before consideration by the full Georgia Senate.

Once again, we at Finch McCranie, LLP are proud to be part of the process of helping enact laws that stop fraud against the government. We will continue to report on the progress of these smart and cost-effective laws both in Georgia and in other states.

The New York legislature has become the latest state to agree to the enactment of a State False Claims Act, when it approved passage of such a whistleblower law as part of approving the state budget. The Buffalo Times reported on this encouraging development.

We have written before about why states are passing their own whistleblower laws to protect taxpayer money. Congress has created significant financial incentives for states that pass their own state false claims acts, with whistleblower provisions that are at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act.

States whose whistleblower laws are approved by the Office of Inspector General are entitled to a 10% increase in their share of Medicaid fraud recoveries. OIG recently approved the whistleblower laws of Hawaii and Virginia, which now join Illinois, Massachusetts, and Tennessee as having whistleblower laws that qualify the state for the extra funds. OIG has disapproved the whistleblower laws of seven other states, California, Florida, Louisiana, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, and Texas, which can still strengthen their laws to make them as effective as the federal False Claims Act.

New York Governor Elliott Spitzer and Attorney General Andrew Cuomo supported the whistleblower law.

We are encouraged that New York has taken the responsible step of protecting taxpayer funds by passing its own whistleblower law.

We have been writing about why states are passing their own whistleblower laws, with qui tam provisions that are at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act. Georgia's legislature took a giant step forward when its House of Representatives today passed the State False Medicaid Claims Act--by an overwhelming margin of 164-2!

As we have mentioned before on this whistleblower lawyer blog, when the House Judiciary Committee met to discuss and approve the new whistleblower statute, two witnesses were invited to explain the new law: the Inspector General of the Department of Community Health, and this whistleblower blog author. We at Finch McCranie, LLP are proud to be part of this effort to protect taxpayer dollars in the Medicaid program.

States are figuring out how to pass whistleblower laws with effective "qui tam" provisions, so that they qualify to receive more money from Medicaid fraud settlements. The Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services has announced that, unlike 7 of the 10 state whistleblower laws that OIG had previously reviewed, the whistleblower laws of Hawaii and Virginia pass muster under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.

We have previously discussed why states are passing or improving their own whistleblower laws with qui tam provisions--Congress creative large financial incentives because effective qui tam whistleblower laws are essential to preventing fraud against the government. We applaud Hawaii and Virginia for making their whistleblower law provisions as effective as those of the federal False Claims Act!

This afternoon I had the privilege of joining the Inspector General of Georgia's Department of Community Health, Doug Colburn, in serving as the two invited witnesses who were asked to explain how the new "State False Medicaid Claims Act" would work, in testimony before the full Judiciary Committee of the Georgia House of Representatives.

The new whistleblower law was approved unanimously by the Judiciary Committee, and is gaining steam toward passage.

Chairman Wendell Willard expressed his strong support for encouraging whistleblowers to report wrongdoing. The bill's sponsor, Rep. Edward Lindsey, thanked the cooperative efforts by the Georgia Department of Community Health, the Office of Attorney General, and the private bar to fashion what is a "very good bill."

A representative of the Medical Association of Georgia also testified that it supports the bill as passed by the Committee, after one change was made to make the statute of limitations consistent with the federal False Claims Act.

We have written before about this proposed new whistleblower law, one of many that various states are now considering to qualify for the financial incentives created by Congress in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. States that have or enact False Claims Acts with qui tam whistleblower provisions that are at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act are entitled to receive a 10% increase in their share of Medicaid fraud recoveries.

Our firm, Finch McCranie, LLP, is proud to contribute its experience to assist the legislature in enacting a very good "State False Medicaid Claims Act."

Whistleblowerlawyerblog Author Testifies In Support of Georgia Department of Community Health's "State False Medicaid Claims Act"

This morning, a new state False Claims Act cleared a hurdle as it was approved by a Georgia legislative subcommittee.

Georgia's new "State False Medicaid Claims Act," which has qui tam whistleblower provisions similar to the federal False Claims Act, received unanimous support among members of the subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee chaired by Rep. Edward Lindsey of Atlanta.

Testifying in support of the new False Medicaid Claims Act were Inspector General Doug Colburn of the Georgia Department of Community Health, and Mary Beth Westmoreland of the Georgia Attorney General's Office.

Also testifying in support of the law was Michael A. Sullivan of Finch McCranie, LLP (one of the authors of this whistleblowerlawyerblog). Sullivan was asked to address how the federal False Claims Act has worked in practice since he began working with the statute in the late 1980s, and how the states have seized the opportunity to create their own whistleblower laws, similar to the False Claims Act. He discussed the great successes of the federal statute as the government's "primary weapon" for combatting fraud. Sullivan also provided the legislators a version of his article explaining how the False Claims Act works, which also appears on this whistleblower lawer blog.

Georgia, like the many other states now considering a False Claims Act, stands to increase its share of Medicaid fraud recoveries substantially if it enacts a bill that passes muster with the Office of Inspector General of HHS.

We were very pleased to be a part of the process of assisting legislators in protecting taxpayer funds. We will be there as the new whistleblower law progresses through the legislative process.

We were encouraged to see that Georgia has just joined the states that are considering a State "False Claims Act" with whistleblower provisions.

As we have discussed before on the Whistleblower Lawyer Blog, Congress has created great financial incentives for states that pass their own versions of the federal False Claims Act, with qui tam provisions that encourage whistleblowers. States can increase by 10% their share of Medicare fraud recoveries by passing their own False Claims Acts, but the state laws must pass muster with OIG and be at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act. Otherwise, as approximately seven other states were disappointed to find, the state does not receive an increase in its share of Medicare fraud recoveries.

Rep. Ed Lindsey is the sponsor of Georgia's proposed "State False Medicaid Claims Act." The new law would apply to Medicaid fraud and false claims, but not other fraud and false claims that cost the state taxpayers money.

The challenge will be to make sure that the new law is tough enough and broad enough to meet OIG's criteria. As we reported before, OIG has disapproved the False Claims statutes of California, Florida, Louisiana, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, and Texas, as not as effective as the federal False Claims Act. No approval by OIG, no extra money for the state.

We will be discussing this new whistleblower statute, as well as others. Those who wish to read it can do so here:

Continue reading "New Medicaid False Claims Act Proposed in Georgia" »

Whistleblower suits that reveal Medicaid fraud in Texas have grabbed the attention of the Texas Legislature--which apparently recognizes how powerful state False Claims Acts can be.

Today's Houston Chronicle reports that Texas is working through a "backlog" of Medicaid fraud cases, the top 20 of which could bring another $700 million to the State (and presumably a significant amount to whistleblowers).

Whistleblower cases have been so effective that the legislators asked what more could be accomplished with more resources provided to pursue these fraud cases. The Texas Attorney General's Office seems to have done a commendable job with the resources it now has, but Attorney General Greg Abbott (my law school classmate at Vanderbilt Law School) agrees that more resources would produce even greater recoveries.

Patrick O'Connell, chief of the Civil Medicaid Fraud Section in Texas, has been impressive. He has led the team that since 1999 reportedly has recovered $72 million for Texas, and assisted in recovering $139 million more for the federal and other state governments.

And we keep wondering why every state has not enacted its own whistleblower False Claims Act---especially since Congress has offered huge financial rewards to states that have qui tam whistleblower statutes that are at least as effective as the federal False Claims Act.

I looked into the experiences that states have had with their own False Claims Acts, because almost every state is considering passing its own. I have tried to provide a brief summary that I hope is useful to you.

To encourage states to enact their own False Claims statutes with qui tam whistleblower provisions that are at least as effective as the federal Act, Congress created a large financial incentive when it passed the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. States that have or enact such acts become eligible as of January 1, 2007, for a 10% increase in the state's share of Medicaid fraud recoveries.

Many states, therefore, will consider whether to follow suit by enacting their own False Claims Act as early as 2007. Thus, it is important to consider other states' experiences with their own state statutes governing false claims.

Most qui tam cases filed under the state statutes have been related to health care. Many are "global" Medicaid cases that were first developed in federal courts as Medicare and Medicaid fraud cases and that concerned a nationwide fraud which had been investigated by multiple federal and state jurisdictions.

Texas recovered $45.5 million in 2004 from pharmaceutical companies based on their allegedly overstating the price of prescription brand-name and generic-brand drugs. The Texas Attorney General stated that neither the lawsuit nor the settlement would have been possible had the state not enacted a qui tam provision.

Continue reading "Why States Are Passing Their Own Qui Tam Whistleblower Laws" »

Finch McCranie, LLP has recently learned that many state government officials, including Governor Perdue of Georgia, have received a proposed State False Claims Act for consideration to be enacted in 2007. Even though the Bill has been drafted and is on his desk, at present, the Bill has not been submitted to the Legislature for consideration. Obviously, this raises a serious question as to why it is that the Governor is delaying action on this important piece of legislation.

Section 1909 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 creates a financial incentive for states to enact legislation that establishes liability to the state for individuals or entities that submit false or fraudulent claims to a state Medicaid program. This incentive takes the form of an increase in the state’s share of any amounts recovered from a state action brought under a “qualifying law.” In order for a state to qualify for this incentive, the state law must meet certain enumerated requirements as determined by the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services in consultation with the Attorney General. The Office of Inspector General has already ruled in several different cases that certain states have not enacted “qualified laws” and therefore do not qualify for the increase share of fraud recoveries which can amount to a ten (10%) percent increase over amounts currently being received by the states. Thus, if the Governor is to act, it is imperative that he submit a “qualified law” to the Legislature for its consideration. In essence, a “qualified law” is one that is as strong and effective in its qui tam whistleblower provisions, and other features, as the Federal False Claims Act.

As we see it, there is no good reason for the Governor not to submit this proposed legislation for consideration. If he is to do so, however, he should first submit the proposed legislation to the Office of Inspector General as the Office of Inspector General will advise the State whether it “qualifies” for the increased share of fraud recoveries. Indeed, the OIG is required to consider whether the state law is, at least, as effective in rewarding and facilitating Qui Tam actions when compared to the provisions of the Federal False Claims Act. In order to request a OIG review of the state law, the Governor should submit a complete copy of the proposed legislation to the Office of Inspector General Department of Health and Human Services, Cohen Building, Mail Stop 5527, 330 Independence Avenue, S. W., Washington, DC 20201, Attn: Roderick Chen, Office of Counsel to the Inspector General.

Continue reading "Will Your State Have a State False Claims Act?" »